Figuring out this so-called Reality3


simulation theory #2 guessing game universe

Simulation Theory #2: Guessing Game


It’s about time I finally get around to actually writing the continuation of the Simulation Theory I started. If you haven’t read the first one, I highly recommend it. In this series, I ponder and attempt to illustrate hypothetical scenarios as to why an advanced civilization might tinker around with creating a simulated universe. In this […]

Some Stuff I've Done

The beast will be released... soon

Go ahead, enjoy some short SciFi-ish stories I've written.

Reality is not, I believe, a fixed entity, but is very, if not fully, dependent on how it is interpreted.

-Michael Madsen on Alien Encounter Doc, The Visit

Amputee Makes History with APL’s Modular Prosthetic Limb

Wow… So how long before this is no longer a solution to a problem but a necessary upgrade for modern living?

Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.


Humans need not apply

Automation doesn’t stop at manual labor…

Understanding Justice – A brief overview


ME: Okay, here’s the scenario. A man is convicted of murder. It’s proven that he did it. The evidence is irrefutable. However we have a scientifically accurate palm reading machine to peer into his future.

FRIEND: Aaaaand this is why I hate doing hypotheticals.

Why Now? A Quest in Metaphysics

He mentions these ideas blew his mind when he first heard them and he certainly does not fail to deliver…

Seth Lloyd, a quantum-mechanical engineer at MIT, estimated the number of “computer operations” our universe has performed since the Big Bang — basically, every event that has ever happened. To repeat them, and generate a perfect facsimile of reality down to the last atom, would take more energy than the universe has.

“The computer would have to be bigger than the universe, and time would tick more slowly in the program than in reality,” says Lloyd. “So why even bother building it?”

But others soon realized that making an imperfect copy of the universe that’s just good enough to fool its inhabitants would take far less computational power. In such a makeshift cosmos, the fine details of the microscopic world and the farthest stars might only be filled in by the programmers on the rare occasions that people study them with scientific equipment. As soon as no one was looking, they’d simply vanish.

-Discover Magazine